导弹包装箱运输随机动响应仿真与缓冲参数优化

任孟龙, 曹金荣, 卢航, 张迪, 李斯

包装工程(技术栏目) ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (19) : 267-275.

PDF(1868 KB)
PDF(1868 KB)
包装工程(技术栏目) ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (19) : 267-275. DOI: 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.19.027
装备防护

导弹包装箱运输随机动响应仿真与缓冲参数优化

  • 任孟龙1, 曹金荣1, 卢航1, 张迪1,*, 李斯2
作者信息 +

Simulation of Random Vibration Response and Cushioning Parameter Optimization for Missile Packaging Container Transportation

  • REN Menglong1, CAO Jinrong1, LU Hang1, ZHANG Di1,*, LI Si2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 针对导弹公路运输中的随机振动损伤防护,建立导弹-包装箱-缓冲衬垫耦合动力学模型,采用差分进化(Differential Evolution,DE)和粒子群优化算法(Particle Swarm Optimization,PSO)对缓冲参数进行优化设计,为导弹包装箱的缓冲防护提供理论依据和设计参考。方法 基于GJB 150.16A—2009,采用频域滤波法合成满足公路运输要求的随机振动加速度时程。建立考虑导弹重心偏移引起的三向弱耦合效应的三自由度(MDOF)及单自由度(SDOF)模型,选取发泡聚乙烯(EPE)、发泡聚苯乙烯(EPS)与蜂窝纸板3类缓冲材料,以3次多项式描述其力学特性,采用Newmark-β法进行时域积分求解,通过Monte Carlo仿真对结果进行统计分析,并分别采用DE和PSO这2种全局优化算法搜索最优刚度-阻尼组合,优化模型中引入静态承载约束,以确保工程的可行性。结果 3种缓冲材料的减振性能呈现“加速度-位移”折中特征。综合考虑重复使用性、洁净度与环境适应性等要求,选取EPE作为参数优化的基体材料,优化后峰值加速度降至1.14g(降幅约50.2%),均方根加速度降至0.245g(降幅约43.8%),最大位移降至7.81 mm。结论 在本文所考察的材料参数和激励条件下,硬化型3次非线性模型能有效描述泡沫材料密实化阶段的动力学行为,优化后的缓冲参数显著降低了加速度响应。

Abstract

In response to the protection against random vibration damage during road transportation of missiles, the work aims to establish a coupled dynamics model of the missile-packaging container-cushioning liner and adopt Differential Evolution (DE) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to optimize the cushioning parameters, providing a theoretical basis and design reference for the cushioning protection of missile packaging containers. Based on the GJB 150.16A-2009 standard, the frequency-domain filtering method was used to synthesize random vibration acceleration time histories in line with road transportation requirements. Both a three-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) model and a single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) model were established, taking into account the three-dimensional weak coupling effect caused by the offset of the missile’s center of gravity. Three types of cushioning materials, including expanded polyethylene (EPE), expanded polystyrene (EPS), and honeycomb cardboard were selected, and their mechanical behavior was described by cubic polynomials. The Newmark-β method was adopted for time-domain integration, and Monte Carlo simulation was used for statistical analysis of the results. Two global optimization algorithms, DE and PSO, were respectively applied to search for the optimal stiffness-damping combination, with a static load-bearing constraint introduced into the optimization model to ensure engineering feasibility. The vibration-damping performance of the three cushioning materials exhibited an acceleration-displacement trade-off. Taking comprehensive account of the requirements for reusability, cleanliness, and environmental adaptability, EPE was selected as the base material for parameter optimization. After optimization, the peak acceleration decreased to 1.14g (a reduction of approximately 50.2%), the root-mean-square (RMS) acceleration decreased to 0.245g (a reduction of approximately 43.8%), and the maximum displacement decreased to 7.81 mm. Under the material parameters and excitation conditions investigated in this work, the hardening-type cubic nonlinear model can effectively describe the dynamic behavior of foam materials during the densification stage. The optimized cushioning parameters significantly reduce the acceleration response.

关键词

导弹包装箱 / 随机振动 / GJB 150.16A / Newmark-beta法 / 缓冲优化 / 差分进化 / 粒子群优化

Key words

missile packaging container / random vibration / GJB 150.16A / Newmark-beta method / cushioning optimization / differential evolution (DE) / particle swarm optimization (PSO)

引用本文

导出引用
任孟龙, 曹金荣, 卢航, 张迪, 李斯. 导弹包装箱运输随机动响应仿真与缓冲参数优化[J]. 包装工程. 2026, 47(19): 267-275 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.19.027
REN Menglong, CAO Jinrong, LU Hang, ZHANG Di, LI Si. Simulation of Random Vibration Response and Cushioning Parameter Optimization for Missile Packaging Container Transportation[J]. Packaging Engineering. 2026, 47(19): 267-275 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.19.027
中图分类号: TB485.1    TB322   

参考文献

[1] ROUILLARD V, LAMB M J, LEPINE J, et al.The Case for Reviewing Laboratory-Based Road Transport Simulations for Packaging Optimisation[J]. Packaging Technology and Science, 2021, 34(6): 339-351.
[2] GARRIDO M, ESTEBAN L, NAVARRO P, et al.Measurement and Analysis of Truck Vibration Levels in Logistic Spain Distribution to Simulate Package Testing[J]. Packaging Technology and Science, 2023, 36(7): 585-594.
[3] MOLNÁR B, BÖRÖCZ P. Experimental Comparison of Field and Accelerated Random Vertical Vibration Levels of Stacked Packages for Small Parcel Delivery Shipments[J]. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(7): 2927.
[4] YANG S P, LIU Z C.Reliability Analysis for Product Packageviaprobability Density Function of Acceleration Random Response[J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2024, 30(7/8): 1841-1854.
[5] XING Y Q, SUN D Q, CHEN G L.Analysis of the Dynamic Cushioning Property of Expanded Polyethylene Based on the Stress-Energy Method[J]. Polymers, 2023, 15(17): 3603.
[6] 中国人民解放军总装备部军用装备实验室环境试验方法第16部分: 振动试验: GJB 150.16A—2009[S]. 北京:中国人民解放军总装备部, 2009.
The General Armaments Department of the People's Liberation Army of China The General Armaments Department of the People's Liberation Army of China. Laboratory Environmental Test Methods for Military Equipment—Part 16: Vibration Test: GJB 150.16A—2009[S]. Beijing: The General Armaments Department of the People's Liberation Army of China, 2009.
[7] HOSOYAMA A, TSUDA K, HORIGUCHI S.Development and Validation of Kurtosis Response Spectrum Analysis for Antivibration Packaging Design Taking into Consideration Kurtosis[J]. Packaging Technology and Science, 2020, 33(2): 51-64.
[8] 苗红涛. EPE泡沫塑料在多次冲击下的缓冲性能[J]. 包装工程, 2017, 38(5): 111-114.
MIAO H T.EPE Foam Cushioning Performance under Repeated Dropping Shocks[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2017, 38(5): 111-114.
[9] JOODAKY A, BATT G S, GIBERT J M.Prediction of Cushion Curves of Polymer Foams Using a Nonlinear Distributed Parameter Model[J]. Packaging Technology and Science, 2020, 33(1): 3-14.
[10] WANG M Q, LU F D, LIU Q L, et al.A New Method for Predicting the Impact Response of a Corrugated Paperboard Cushioning System Made of Different Flute Types[J]. Packaging Technology and Science, 2025, 38(8): 671-680.
[11] 陈宁, 张功学. 七自由度缓冲衬垫包装的动力学仿真[J]. 包装工程, 2018, 39(9): 1-6.
CHEN N, ZHANG G X.Dynamic Simulation of Cushioning Pad Package with Seven Degrees of Freedom[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2018, 39(9): 1-6.
[12] ROUILLARD V, LAMB M J.Evaluating the Use of Predicted Cushion Curves for Comparing the Performance of Some Sustainable Cushion Systems[J]. Packaging Technology and Science, 2025, 38(1): 53-64.
[13] 高德, 卢富德. 聚乙烯缓冲材料多自由度跌落包装系统优化设计[J]. 振动与冲击, 2012, 31(3): 69-72.
GAO D, LU F D.Optimization Design of MDOF Package Cushioning System Made of Polyethylene[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012, 31(3): 69-72.
[14] 孙百会, 叶子平, 李燕华, 等. 圆柜内机缓冲衬垫多目标优化设计[J]. 包装工程, 2023, 44(13): 208-216.
SUN B H, YE Z P, LI Y H, et al.Multi-Objective Optimization Design of Cushion for Inner Unit of Circular Cabinet Air Conditioner[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2023, 44(13): 208-216.
[15] WANG J, KHAN Y, YANG R H, et al.Dynamical Behaviors of a Coupled Cushioning Packaging Model with Linear and Nonlinear Stiffness[J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2013, 38(6): 1625-1629.
[16] CORNAGGIA A, MRÓWCZYŃSKI D, GAJEWSKI T, et al. Advanced Numerical Analysis of Transport Packaging[J]. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(24): 11932.
[17] Department of Defense. Department of Defense Test Method Standard: Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests: MIL-STD-810H[S]. Washington: Department of Defense, 2019.
[18] GUO Y F, HAN X X, WANG X N, et al.Static Cushioning Energy Absorption of Paper Composite Sandwich Structures with Corrugation and Honeycomb Cores[J]. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials, 2021, 23(4): 1347-1365.
[19] BATHE K J.Finite Element Procedures[M]. 2nd ed. Watertown: Klaus-Jürgen Bathe, 2014.

PDF(1868 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉