纤维金属层合板在ELS测试中的热残余应力影响分析方法

李丹, 田源灏, 易立, 丁兆虎, 秦旭峰, 周杰, 宁慧铭

包装工程(技术栏目) ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (19) : 237-246.

PDF(1642 KB)
PDF(1642 KB)
包装工程(技术栏目) ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (19) : 237-246. DOI: 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.19.024
装备防护

纤维金属层合板在ELS测试中的热残余应力影响分析方法

  • 李丹1, 田源灏2,*, 易立2, 丁兆虎1, 秦旭峰2, 周杰2, 宁慧铭1
作者信息 +

Method for Analyzing the Effect of Thermal Residual Stress in Fiber Metal Laminates during ELS Test

  • LI Dan1, TIAN Yuanhao2,*, YI Li2, DING Zhaohu1, QIN Xufeng2, ZHOU Jie2, NING Huiming1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 针对纤维金属层合板(FMLs)非对称试样在端部加载劈裂(ELS)试验中因残余热应力导致Ⅱ型层间断裂韧性测定出现偏差的问题,建立表观断裂韧性修正方法,提高异质界面性能评价与抗分层设计参数的准确性,为冲击、侵彻和爆炸载荷下FMLs的分层损伤控制、结构完整性保持及先进防护装备的损伤容限设计提供理论支撑。方法 基于FMLs混合界面及非对称层合结构特征,分析残余热应力对ELS测试结果的影响,提出表观断裂韧性理论修正方法,并结合不同温度条件下的ELS试验和有限元仿真对其有效性进行验证。结果 在相同温度下,对CFRP-铝合金纤维金属层板层间裂纹稳定扩展阶段的界面Ⅱ型断裂韧性进行分析时,未修正的平均表观断裂韧性差值最高约为1 354 J/m2,而经修正后,最大差值降至约244 J/m2,测试结果离散性明显降低。结论 残余热应力会显著影响非对称FMLs试样ELS测试所得表观断裂韧性。采用所提出的修正方法能够有效降低热应力引起的评价误差,提高界面Ⅱ型断裂韧性的评价准确性,为FMLs结构抗分层设计提供更可靠的参数支撑。

Abstract

To address the bias in the measured Mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of asymmetric fiber-metal laminate (FML) specimens caused by residual thermal stresses during end-loaded split (ELS) test, the work aims to develop a correction method for the apparent fracture toughness to improve the accuracy of heterogeneous-interface characterization and the reliability of design parameters for delamination resistance, providing theoretical support for controlling delamination damage, maintaining structural integrity, and designing damage-tolerant FML components for advanced protective equipment subjected to impact, penetration, and blast loading. Based on the characteristics of the hybrid interfaces and asymmetric laminate configurations of FMLs, the effect of residual thermal stresses on ELS test results was analyzed, and a theoretical correction method for the apparent fracture toughness was proposed. Its effectiveness was validated through ELS tests conducted at different temperatures and finite element simulations. For the interfacial Mode II fracture toughness of CFRP/aluminum-alloy FMLs during stable interlaminar crack propagation at the same temperature, the maximum difference between the uncorrected mean apparent fracture toughness values was approximately 1 354 J/m2, whereas the maximum difference decreased to approximately 244 J/m2 after correction, with a marked reduction in the scatter of the test results. These findings demonstrate that residual thermal stresses significantly affect the apparent fracture toughness obtained from ELS tests on asymmetric FML specimens. The proposed correction method effectively reduces the evaluation error induced by thermal stresses, improves the accuracy of interfacial Mode II fracture toughness measurements, and provides more reliable parameters for the delamination-resistant design of FML structures.

关键词

超混杂复合材料 / 断裂韧性 / Ⅱ型分层扩展 / 热残余应力 / 内聚力模型

Key words

fibre-metal laminates / fracture toughness / Mode II delamination propagation / thermal residual stress / cohesive zone model

引用本文

导出引用
李丹, 田源灏, 易立, 丁兆虎, 秦旭峰, 周杰, 宁慧铭. 纤维金属层合板在ELS测试中的热残余应力影响分析方法[J]. 包装工程. 2026, 47(19): 237-246 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.19.024
LI Dan, TIAN Yuanhao, YI Li, DING Zhaohu, QIN Xufeng, ZHOU Jie, NING Huiming. Method for Analyzing the Effect of Thermal Residual Stress in Fiber Metal Laminates during ELS Test[J]. Packaging Engineering. 2026, 47(19): 237-246 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.19.024
中图分类号: TB33   

参考文献

[1] 彭华康, 黄震, 贾世锦, 等. 航天器运输包装箱极限热控能力试验研究[J]. 航天器环境工程, 2018, 35(6): 575-580.
PENG H K, HUANG Z, JIA S J, et al.Experimental Study of Ultimate Thermal Control Capacity of Spacecraft Transport Package[J]. Spacecraft Environment Engineering, 2018, 35(6): 575-580.
[2] ROSENTHAL S, MAAß F, KAMALIEV M, et al.Lightweight in Automotive Components by Forming Technology[J]. Automotive Innovation, 2020, 3(3): 1-15.
[3] ANAND S, DIGHE N, GUPTA P, et al.Failure Modes and Energy Absorption in Glass Reinforced Aluminum (GLARE) Hybrid Laminates Subjected to Three-Point Bending[J]. Composites Part C: Open Access, 2025, 18: 100651.
[4] SERUBIBI A, HAZELL P J, ESCOBEDO J P, et al.Fibre-Metal Laminate Structures: High-Velocity Impact, Penetration, and Blast Loading-a Review[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2023, 173: 107674.
[5] YILDIZ T.Design and Analysis of a Lightweight Composite Shipping Container Made of Carbon Fiber Laminates[J]. Logistics, 2019, 3(3): 18.
[6] 田源灏, 周建宏, 杨智宇, 等. 表征超混杂复合材料Ⅰ型分层行为的半解析法研究[J]. 包装工程, 2025, 46(9): 77-85.
TIAN Y H, ZHOU J H, YANG Z Y, et al.Semi-Analytical Method for Characterizing Mode Ⅰ Delamination Behavior of Super-Hybrid Composite Materials[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2025, 46(9): 77-85.
[7] PAI A, KINI C R, SATISH S B.Experimental and Numerical Studies of Fiber Metal Laminates Comprising Ballistic Fabrics Subjected to Shock Impact[J]. Composite Structures, 2022, 297: 115917.
[8] YU B, HE P G, JIANG Z Y, et al.Interlaminar Fracture Properties of Surface Treated Ti-CFRP Hybrid Composites under Long-Term Hygrothermal Conditions[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2017, 96: 9-17.
[9] DANIEL I M, ISHAI O.Engineering Mechanics of Composite Materials[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
[10] CALLISTER W D.Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction[M]. 7th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
[11] LAWCOCK G, YE L, MAI Y W, et al.The Effect of Adhesive Bonding between Aluminum and Composite Prepreg on the Mechanical Properties of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Metal Laminates[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 1997, 57(1): 35-45.
[12] NAIRN J A.On the Calculation of Energy Release Rates for Cracked Laminates with Residual Stresses[J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2006, 139(2): 267-293.
[13] ASTM International.ASTM D5528/D5528M-21, Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites[S]. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2021.
[14] Japanese Standards Association.JIS K 7086: 1993, Testing Methods for Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastics[S]. Tokyo: Japanese Standards Association, 1993.
[15] ASTM International.ASTM D6671/D6671M-06, Standard Test Method for Mixed Mode I-Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites[S]. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2006.
[16] BLACKMAN B R K, KINLOCH A J. Fracture Tests on Structural Adhesive Joints[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001: 225-267.
[17] GB/T 39484—2020 纤维增强塑料复合材料用校准端载荷分裂试验(C-ELS)和有效裂纹长度法测定单向增强材料的Ⅱ型断裂韧性[S].
GB/T 39484—2020 Fibre-reinforced Plastic Composites. Determination of the Mode Ⅱ Fracture Resistance for Unidirectionally Reinforced Materials Using the Calibrated End-loaded Split(C-ELS) Test and an Effective Crack Length Approach[S].
[18] WU T, DEGENER S, TINKLOH S, et al.Characterization of Residual Stresses in Fiber Metal Laminate Interfaces-a Combined Approach Applying Hole-Drilling Method and Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Diffraction[J]. Composite Structures, 2022, 299: 116071.
[19] YOKOZEKI T, OGASAWARA T, AOKI T.Correction Method for Evaluation of Interfacial Fracture Toughness of DCB, ENF and MMB Specimens with Residual Thermal Stresses[J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2008, 68(3/4): 760-767.
[20] KOORD J, VÖLKERINK O, PETERSEN E, et al. Effect of Low Temperature on Mode I and Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of CFRP-Steel Hybrid Laminates[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2023, 262: 110773.
[21] GUILLÉN F J. The Influence of Cooling Rate on the Fracture Properties of a Thermoplastic-Based Fibre-Metal Laminate[J]. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 2002, 21(8): 749-772.
[22] DAVIES P, SIMS G D, BLACKMAN B R K, et al. Comparison of Test Configurations for Determination of Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness Results from International Collaborative Test Programme[J]. Plastics, Rubber and Composites, 1999, 28(9): 432-437.
[23] WANG W X, TAKAO Y, NAKATA M.Effects of Friction on the Measurement of the Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Composite Laminates[C]//Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Composite Materials, San Diego, 2003.
[24] WANG W X, NAKATA M, TAKAO Y, et al.Experimental Investigation on Test Methods for Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Testing of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composites[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2009, 40(9): 1447-1455.
[25] DING Z H, GONG Y, WANG Z M, et al.A Semi-Analytical Method for the Determination of Fracture Toughness and Bridging Law in ELS Test[J]. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2023, 123: 103712.
[26] KATOUZIAN M, VLASE S.A Model to Study the Creep Behavior of Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Resin Composites under Temperature[J]. Applied Sciences, 2025, 15(8): 4206.
[27] 龚愉, 张寒松, 姚建尧, 等. 一种适用于高低温环境下的复合材料层合板II型疲劳分层试验装置: CN202010300870.6[P].2022-10-04.
GONG Y, ZHANG H S, YAO J Y, et al. A Mode II Fatigue Delamination Test Device for Composite Laminates Suitable for High- and Low-temperature Environments: CN202010300870.6[P].2022-10-04.

基金

国家自然科学基金(12572086)

PDF(1642 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉