焦炭热态性能标准样品的包装设计与防护效果研究

房潇

包装工程(技术栏目) ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (11) : 301-307.

PDF(595 KB)
PDF(595 KB)
包装工程(技术栏目) ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (11) : 301-307. DOI: 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.11.031
装备防护

焦炭热态性能标准样品的包装设计与防护效果研究

  • 房潇1,2
作者信息 +

Packaging Design and Protective Effect of Standard Samples for Coke Thermal Properties

  • FANG Xiao1,2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 针对焦炭热态性能(反应性及反应后强度)标准样品在仓储、转运过程中易碰撞掉粉的问题,优化其包装防护方式,以减少样品形态变化对量值稳定性的影响。方法 依据焦炭块状、多孔、脆性较高的特点,设置散装塑料瓶、三层铝箔袋真空封装、四层尼龙铝箔袋配合发泡聚乙烯(Expanded polyethylene,EPE)珍珠棉缓冲3种方案。参照包装运输试验标准,开展2.0 m高度10次指定部位跌落试验及5层码放24 h堆码试验,并采用单因素方差分析和Welch t检验比较质量损失差异。结果 方案A跌落后平均质量损失为1.63 g,外包装均有轻微形变,但堆码后焦球完好率和密封状态保持良好;方案B平均质量损失降至0.36 g,跌落后内包装漏气率为90%;方案C平均质量损失为0.22 g,损失率为0.052%,堆码后外包装平均形变量为0.03 mm,内包装均未漏气。3组质量损失差异显著(P<0.001),方案B与方案C差异亦显著(P=0.016)。结论 四层尼龙铝箔袋与EPE珍珠棉组成的复合包装可同时改善抗穿刺和缓冲效果。方案A可用于短期静载存放,但不宜用于长途运输;方案C更适合作为焦炭及类似易碎块状标准样品的包装方案。

Abstract

The work aims to improve the packaging protection of coke certified reference materials for thermal properties, including coke reactivity index (CRI) and coke strength after reaction (CSR), because these samples are prone to powder formation and edge breakage during storage and transportation, so as to reduce the impact of sample shape changes on the stability of the measured values. According to the lump-like, porous and brittle characteristics of coke, three packaging schemes were compared: loose packing in plastic bottles, vacuum sealing in triple-layer aluminum foil bags, and quadruple-layer nylon-aluminum foil bags combined with expanded polyethylene (EPE) pearl cotton cushioning. Drop tests from 2.0 m at ten specified impact positions and five-layer stacking tests for 24 h were carried out with reference to transport packaging test standards. The mass-loss data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Welch pairwise t-tests. Scheme A showed an average mass loss of 1.63 g after dropping, and all outer packages were slightly deformed; nevertheless, the coke balls and sealing state remained intact after stacking. Scheme B reduced the average mass loss to 0.36 g, but 90% of the inner bags lost vacuum integrity after dropping. Scheme C gave the lowest average mass loss of 0.22 g, corresponding to 0.052%, and the average outer-package deformation after stacking was 0.03 mm, with no vacuum leakage observed. The mass loss differences among the three schemes were significant (P<0.001), and the difference between schemes B and C was also significant (P=0.016). The composite packaging of quadruple-layer nylon-aluminum foil bags and EPE pearl cotton can improve both puncture resistance and cushioning performance. Scheme A is acceptable for short-term static storage but not for long-distance transportation, whereas scheme C is more suitable for coke and similar fragile lump-form reference materials.

关键词

焦炭 / 标准样品 / 包装设计 / 防护效能 / 跌落试验 / 堆码测试

Key words

coke / standard sample / packaging design / protective performance / drop test / stacking test

引用本文

导出引用
房潇. 焦炭热态性能标准样品的包装设计与防护效果研究[J]. 包装工程. 2026, 47(11): 301-307 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.11.031
FANG Xiao. Packaging Design and Protective Effect of Standard Samples for Coke Thermal Properties[J]. Packaging Engineering. 2026, 47(11): 301-307 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2026.11.031
中图分类号: TB482    TB484   

参考文献

[1] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 焦炭反应性及反应后强度试验方法: GB/T 4000—2017[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Method for the Determination of Coke Reactivity Index (CRI) and Coke Strength after Reaction (CSR): GB/T 4000-2017[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2017.
[2] INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. Coke—Determination of Coke Reactivity Index (CRI) and Coke Strength after Reaction (CSR): ISO 18894:2018[S].Geneva:International Organization for Standardization, 2018.
[3] 国家标准化管理委员会. 标准样品工作导则第3部分: 标准样品定值的一般原则和统计方法: GB/T 15000.3—2008[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Directives for the Work of Reference Materials—Part 3: Reference Materials—General and Statistical Principles for Certification: GB/T 15000.3-2008[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2008.
[4] 国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 标准样品工作导则第7部分: 标准样品生产者能力的通用要求: GB/T 15000.7—2021[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021.
State Administration for Market Regulation, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Directives for the Work of Reference Materials—Part 7: General Requirements for the Competence of Reference Material Producers: GB/T 15000.7-2021[S].Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2021.
[5] International Organization for Standardization. ISO 33405:2024, Reference Materials—Approaches for Characterization and Assessment of Homogeneity and Stability[S]. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2024.
[6] NORTH L, BLACKMORE K, NESBITT K, MAHONEY M R.Methods of Coke Quality Prediction: a Review[J]. Fuel, 2018, 219: 426-445.
[7] NORTH L, BLACKMORE K, NESBITT K, et al.Methods of Coke Quality Prediction: A Review[J]. Fuel, 2018, 219: 426-445.
[8] KOVAL L, SAKUROVS R.Variability of Metallurgical Coke Reactivity under the NSC Test Conditions[J]. Fuel, 2019, 241: 519-521.
[9] KUMAR D, SAXENA V K, TIWARI H P, et al.Variability in Metallurgical Coke Reactivity Index (CRI) and Coke Strength after Reaction (CSR): An Experimental Study[J]. ACS Omega, 2022, 7(2): 1703-1711.
[10] WANG Q, GUO R, ZHAO X F, et al.A New Testing and Evaluating Method of Cokes with Greatly Varied CRI and CSR[J]. Fuel, 2016, 182: 879-885.
[11] HUANG J C, GUO R, TAO L, et al.Effects of Stefan Flow on Metallurgical Coke Gasification with CO2[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2020, 34(3): 2936-2944.
[12] HUANG J C, TAO L, TIE W B, et al.Transport Properties of CO2 in Different Reactivity Coke Solution Loss Reaction Based on Stefan Flow Theory[J]. ACS Omega, 2020, 5(41): 26817-26828.
[13] 全浩, 韩永志. 标准物质及其应用技术[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2003.
QUAN H, HAN Y Z.Reference Material and Its Application Technology[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2003.
[14] 全国标准样品技术委员会. 标准样品工作导则第6部分: 标准样品的包装、标签和证书: GB/T 15000.6—2020[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020.
National Technical Committee for Standard Samples. Directives for the Work of Reference Materials—Part 6: Reference Materials—Packaging, Labels and Accompanying Documentation: GB/T 15000.6-2020[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2020.
[15] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 包装运输包装件基本试验第3部分: 静载荷堆码试验方法: GB/T 4857.3—2008[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Packaging—Basic Tests for Transport Packages—Part 3: Stacking Test Methods Using a Static Load: GB/T 4857.3-2008[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2008.
[16] XING Y Q, SUN D Q, CHEN G L.Analysis of the Dynamic Cushioning Property of Expanded Polyethylene Based on the Stress-Energy Method[J]. Polymers, 2023, 15(17): 3603.
[17] YANG X J, LI H X, SUN Y, et al.Research on the Design Method of Cushioning Packaging for Products with Unbalanced Mass[J]. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(15): 8632.

基金

煤炭科学技术研究院有限公司科技发展基金项目(2025JC-03)

PDF(595 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/