Numerical Simulation Modeling of C60 Nails Penetrating Q235 Target Plates and Effect of Impact Parameters on Penetration Depth

ZHANG Xiaolong; JIANG Zenghui; MU Qiang; LI Minggang; YANG Guohua

doi:10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2025.11.034

PDF(2106 KB)

Packaging Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11) : 313-321. DOI: 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2025.11.034

Numerical Simulation Modeling of C60 Nails Penetrating Q235 Target Plates and Effect of Impact Parameters on Penetration Depth

ZHANG Xiaolong, JIANG Zenghui, MU Qiang, LI Minggang, YANG Guohua

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The work aims to investigate the effect of impact parameters on the penetration performance of C60 nails penetrating Q235 target plates. Firstly, the Johnson-Cook constitutive model parameters for C60 nail material were experimentally determined. Secondly, a simulation model for the penetration of the C60 nail into the Q235 target plate was established, and the reliability of the simulation model was verified through penetration depth experiments. Finally, the penetration process was simulated with this model to study the effects of impact parameters. As the impact angle increased, the penetration depth decreased. When the impact angle reached 60º, the nail exhibited a skip phenomenon. In the range of 0-5 mm for the nail-plate distance, the penetration depth increased significantly as the distance grew. However, when the nail-plate distance exceeded 15 mm, the growth rate of impact velocity markedly decreased with further distance increments, and the penetration depth stabilized. When the driving load reached 320 MPa, the C60 nail could effectively penetrate a 14 mm thick Q235 target plate. The effect of impact parameters on the perforation performance of C60 nails into the Q235 target plate has been obtained, which is of great significance for improving the use performance of nails and further optimizing the structural design of the nail gun body.

Key words

nail / JC constitutive model / tensile test / penetration depth / touch-plate velocity

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

ZHANG Xiaolong, JIANG Zenghui, MU Qiang, LI Minggang, YANG Guohua. Numerical Simulation Modeling of C60 Nails Penetrating Q235 Target Plates and Effect of Impact Parameters on Penetration Depth[J]. Packaging Engineering. 2025, 46(11): 313-321 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2025.11.034

References

[1] 吴鹏程. 射钉失败率的影响因素分析及其优化设计[D]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2016.
WU P C.The Analysis of Influence Factors of Setting Failure Rate and Design Optimization[D]. Suzhou: Soochow University, 2016.
[2] 杨姝, 于晨, 康玉彪, 等. N形装甲板抗穿甲弹侵彻性能数值模拟[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(16): 1-9.
YANG S, YU C, KANG Y B, et al.Numerical Simulation of Anti-Penetration Performance of an N-Shaped Armor Plate Against Armor-Piercing Projectiles[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(16): 1-9.
[3] 高迪, 张艳涛, 李剑斌, 等. 爆燃驱动式射钉侵彻Q235靶板数值模拟[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2019, 51(5): 32-37.
GAO D, ZHANG Y T, LI J B, et al.Numerical Simulation on Penetration of Q235 Steel Target for Deflagration-Driving-Type Nail[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019, 51(5): 32-37.
[4] ROSENBERG Z, DEKEL E.On the Role of Nose Profile in Long-Rod Penetration[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1999, 22(5): 551-557.
[5] 陆文成, 褚庆国, 王晓东, 等. 12.7mm穿燃弹侵彻603装甲钢行为研究[J]. 兵器材料科学与工程, 2023, 46(4): 8-14.
LU W C, CHU Q G, WANG X D, et al.Penetration Behavior of 12.7 mm Armor Piercing Incendiary into 603 Armor Steel[J]. Ordnance Material Science and Engineering, 2023, 46(4): 8-14.
[6] 马倩倩, 韩珏, 陈孝珍, 等. 平头弹撞击2024+7075双层靶的试验及数值模拟研究[J]. 兵器材料科学与工程, 2022, 45(6): 16-24.
MA Q Q, HAN J, CHEN X Z, et al.Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Ballistic Resistance of 2024+7075 Double Layer Plates Impacted by Blunt Projectiles[J]. Ordnance Material Science and Engineering, 2022, 45(6): 16-24.
[7] 魏松波, 王刚, 陈一栋, 等. 基于ANSYS/LS-DYNA的射钉侵入混凝土运动分析[J]. 机械工程与自动化, 2016(2): 110-111.
WEI S B, WANG G, CHEN Y D, et al.Motion Analysis of Nail Penetrating Concrete by ANSYS/LS-DYNA[J]. Mechanical Engineering & Automation, 2016(2): 110-111.
[8] 畅博, 张帆, 彭军, 等. 两种钛合金半穿甲战斗部侵彻单层钢靶性能试验研究[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2024, 45(6): 81-86.
CHANG B, ZHANG F, PENG J, et al.Experimental Study on Penetration Performance of Two Titanium Alloy Semi Armor Piercing Warhead into Single Steel Target[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2024, 45(6): 81-86.
[9] 杨永刚, 冯岩, 魏刚, 等. TC4钛合金板抗高强杆弹正撞击侵彻特性实验研究[J]. 机械强度, 2021, 43(1): 77-82.
YANG Y G, FENG Y, WEI G, et al.Experimental Study on Ballistic Resistance Property of TC4 Titanium Alloy Plate Against High Strength Rod Projectiles[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2021, 43(1): 77-82.
[10] 余洪, 刘俊, 孟玉堂, 等. TC4钛合金板冲塞失效机理研究[J]. 兵器材料科学与工程, 2023, 46(2): 123-131.
YU H, LIU J, MENG Y T, et al.Study on Plugging Failure Mechanism of TC4 Titanium Alloy Plate[J]. Ordnance Material Science and Engineering, 2023, 46(2): 123-131.
[11] 邓云飞, 张伟, 孟凡柱. Q235钢板对平头弹抗侵彻特性研究[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2015, 47(3): 54-59.
DENG Y F, ZHANG W, MENG F Z.Ballistic Performance of Q235 Metal Plates Subjected to Impact by Blunt-Nosed Projectiles[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015, 47(3): 54-59.
[12] 周忠彬, 张博, 赵永刚, 等. 钛合金半穿甲战斗部高速侵彻钢靶性能对比实验研究[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2022, 43(6): 55-60.
ZHOU Z B, ZHANG B, ZHAO Y G, et al.Experimental Study on High-Speed Penetration Performance of Ti Alloy Semi Armor Piercing Warhead into Steel Target[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2022, 43(6): 55-60.
[13] 雷晋伟, 宋佳琪. 钨合金破片对Q235钢靶侵彻规律研究[J]. 包装工程, 2024, 45(23): 296-304.
LEI J W, SONG J Q.Penetration Law of Tungsten Alloy Fragment on Q235 Steel Target[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2024, 45(23): 296-304.
[14] 廖雅文, 陈才, 韩冬生, 等. 93W-Ni-Fe-La合金力学行为及高速侵彻性能研究[J]. 兵器材料科学与工程, 2025, 48(3): 30-35.
LIAO Y W, CHEN C, HAN D S, et al.Study on Mechanical Behavior and High Speed Penetration Performance of 93W-Ni-Fe-La Alloy[J]. Ordnance Material Science and Engineering, 2025, 48(3): 30-35.
[15] 高迪. 爆燃驱动式射钉侵彻靶板的数值模拟与试验研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2018.
GAO D.Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study of Deflagration-Driven Nail Penetration Into Target Plate[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2018.