Selection of the Best Sustainable Packaging Design Scheme Based on AHP-TOPSIS

LI Na, LI Xiao-dong, TANG Dong-fang

Packaging Engineering ›› 2020 ›› Issue (23) : 242-248.

PDF(1953 KB)
PDF(1953 KB)
Packaging Engineering ›› 2020 ›› Issue (23) : 242-248. DOI: 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2020.23.034

Selection of the Best Sustainable Packaging Design Scheme Based on AHP-TOPSIS

  • LI Na1, LI Xiao-dong1, TANG Dong-fang2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

The work aims to propose an optimal scheme selection method based on AHP and TOPSIS to quantitatively evaluate the sustainability of packaging design scheme.The material, production, transportation, sales, treatment and recycling in the design of packaging products were taken into full consideration to establish a three-level evaluation system of sustainable packaging design scheme. The evaluation model of sustainable packaging design scheme was established by combining AHP and TOPSIS. The judgment matrix was constructed by AHP method, and the weight of packaging design scheme index was determined. TOPSIS method was used to calculate the best set and the worst set of evaluation index to get the order of advantages and disadvantages of different design schemes. Three kinds of sustainable packaging design schemes of the same tea product were analyzed with examples. The superiority of the three design schemes was 0.7182, 0.7503 and 0.2673 respectively. The design scheme of the bag gift box designed by Kraft paper and thickened card paper was the best scheme. The experiment shows that the evaluation model constructed by AHP and TOPSIS can sort the advantages and disadvantages of sustainable packaging design scheme reasonably and efficiently. It provides a useful reference for the optimization of sustainable packaging design scheme.

Cite this article

Download Citations
LI Na, LI Xiao-dong, TANG Dong-fang. Selection of the Best Sustainable Packaging Design Scheme Based on AHP-TOPSIS[J]. Packaging Engineering. 2020(23): 242-248 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2020.23.034
PDF(1953 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/