Influence of Relative Density on Compression Properties and Energy Absorption of Spherical Open Cell Aluminum Foam

WANG Jing, QI Ming-si, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Ji-ping, HOU Xiao-li, WANG Zhi-jian

Packaging Engineering ›› 2019 ›› Issue (21) : 105-110.

PDF(452 KB)
PDF(452 KB)
Packaging Engineering ›› 2019 ›› Issue (21) : 105-110. DOI: 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2019.21.016

Influence of Relative Density on Compression Properties and Energy Absorption of Spherical Open Cell Aluminum Foam

  • WANG Jing1, QI Ming-si1, ZHANG Ji-ping1, HOU Xiao-li1, WANG Zhi-jian1, ZHANG Wei2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

The work aims to study the effect of relative density of spherical open cell aluminum foam in the quasi-static compression process on the compression properties and energy absorption of spherical open cell aluminum foam. Quasi-static compression experiments were carried out on three prepared aluminum foam samples with different relative densities. The experimental curves of spherical open cell aluminum foam samples with different relative densities were plotted with relevant software. From the analysis of experimental curves, when the relative density of aluminum foam increased from 0.35 to 0.392, the yield strength of spherical open cell aluminum foam increased by 3.2 MPa, but the maximum energy absorption efficiency decreased by nearly 2.4%. With the increase of relative density of aluminum foam, the higher the compression properties, the higher the compressive strength. Under the same strain, the aluminum foam with higher density has better energy absorption than that with lower density. The higher the relative density of aluminum foam, the lower the maximum energy absorption efficiency and the maximum ideal energy absorption efficiency.

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Jing, QI Ming-si, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Ji-ping, HOU Xiao-li, WANG Zhi-jian. Influence of Relative Density on Compression Properties and Energy Absorption of Spherical Open Cell Aluminum Foam[J]. Packaging Engineering. 2019(21): 105-110 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2019.21.016
PDF(452 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/