不同光源下样品颜色三刺激值测试的比较分析

胥春雨, 许卫东, 李胜水, 周国强, 赵 园

包装工程(技术栏目) ›› 2012 ›› Issue (17) : 102-104.

包装工程(技术栏目) ›› 2012 ›› Issue (17) : 102-104.

不同光源下样品颜色三刺激值测试的比较分析

  • 胥春雨1, 许卫东1, 周国强1, 赵 园1, 李胜水2
作者信息 +

Comparative Analysis of Test Color Tristimulus Values under Different Light Sources

  • XU Chun-yu1, XU Wei-dong1, ZHOU Guo-qiang1, ZHAO Yuan1, LI Sheng-shui2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

针对光学伪装勘察和检测的特殊性,在380~800 nm波长范围里,比较了不同颜色样品分别在太阳光和D65光源下三刺激值的差别,采用CIE1976L*a*b*空间分析了2种光源下颜色样品的色差。结果表明,太阳光作为光学伪装勘察和检测的标准光源更加客观、准确。

Abstract

Difference of tristimulus values of different colors under light source of sunlight and D65 was compared in the 380nm to 800nm wavelength range. The color difference of same samples in the two light sources was analyzed using CIE1976L*a*b* color space. The results showed that standard light source of sunlight for investigation and detection of optical camouflage is more objective and accurate.

引用本文

导出引用
胥春雨, 许卫东, 李胜水, 周国强, 赵 园. 不同光源下样品颜色三刺激值测试的比较分析[J]. 包装工程(技术栏目). 2012(17): 102-104
XU Chun-yu, XU Wei-dong, LI Sheng-shui, ZHOU Guo-qiang, ZHAO Yuan. Comparative Analysis of Test Color Tristimulus Values under Different Light Sources[J]. Packaging Engineering. 2012(17): 102-104

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/