苹果缓冲包装结构设计及性能分析

谢颖佳, 张藩, 孙建明, 潘笑, 常萍萍

包装工程(技术栏目) ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (13) : 169-175.

PDF(4839 KB)
PDF(4839 KB)
包装工程(技术栏目) ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (13) : 169-175. DOI: 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2025.13.019
农产品保鲜与食品包装

苹果缓冲包装结构设计及性能分析

  • 谢颖佳1, 张藩1, 孙建明2,3,*, 潘笑2, 常萍萍1
作者信息 +

Structural Design and Performance Analysis of Apple Buffer Packaging

  • XIE Yingjia1, ZHANG Fan1, SUN Jianming2,3,*, PAN Xiao2, CHANG Pingping1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 为降低苹果在物流运输过程中的破损率,利用有限元法对苹果跌落冲击下的缓冲包装系统进行研究,以选择合适的缓冲包装材料和结构。方法 首先对市场上常用的苹果缓冲包装材料和结构进行分析,在此基础上选用发泡聚苯乙烯(Expanded polystyrene,EPS)、发泡聚乙烯(Expandable polyethylene,EPE)、纸浆模塑和瓦楞纸板4种材料进行缓冲结构设计。其中EPS和EPE各设置6种缓冲厚度,纸浆模塑和瓦楞纸板各选用2种缓冲结构,分别建立包装件跌落有限元仿真模型,分析其缓冲性能。结果 苹果的临界损伤值为0.81 MPa,在高度为800 mm的跌落仿真分析中,当EPE厚度>40 mm,EPS厚度>45 mm时,苹果受到的冲击力小于临界损伤值,而本文选用的纸浆模塑结构(设计为碗状和杯状结构,厚度均为4 mm)和瓦楞纸板缓冲结构(设计为悬空和十字隔板结构,厚度均为3 mm)中苹果受到的冲击力均高于临界损伤值。结论 设置合适厚度的EPE和EPS缓冲包装均可有效保护苹果,且同等厚度下EPE的缓冲效果优于EPS,而本文选用的纸浆模塑和瓦楞纸板缓冲结构则不能很好地保护苹果。有限元仿真分析可快速、有效地评估缓冲包装性能,选择较为优异的缓冲材料和结构,改进现有缓冲结构,提高包装系统的可靠性。

Abstract

The work aims to study the buffer packaging system of apples under the impact of dropping by using finite element method, so as to select appropriate buffer packaging materials and structures, and reduce the breakage rate of apples in logistics transportation. Firstly, apple buffer packaging materials and structures commonly used in the market were analyzed. On this basis, Expanded Polystyrene (EPS), Expandable Polyethylene (EPE), pulp molding and corrugated cardboard were selected for buffer structure design. For EPS and EPE, 6 kinds of buffer thickness were set up, and for pulp molding and corrugated cardboard, 2 kinds of buffer structure were selected, respectively. The finite element simulation model of package drop was established to analyze their buffer performance. The critical damage value of apples was 0.81 MPa. In the simulation analysis of drop from a height of 800 mm, when the thickness of EPE was greater than 40 mm and the thickness of EPS was greater than 45 mm, the impact force of apples was less than the critical damage value. However, the impact force of the apples in the pulp molding structure (designed as bowl and cup structure with thickness of 4 mm) and the corrugated cardboard buffer structure (designed as suspended and cross partition structure with thickness of 3 mm) was higher than the critical damage value. It can be seen the EPE and EPS buffer packaging with appropriate thickness can effectively protect apples, and the buffer effect of EPE is better than EPS at the same thickness, while the pulp molding and corrugated cardboard buffer structure selected in this paper can not protect apples well. Finite element simulation analysis can quickly and effectively evaluate the performance of buffer packaging, select better buffer materials and structures, improve the existing buffer structure, and improve the reliability of the packaging system.

关键词

苹果 / 跌落冲击 / 缓冲包装 / 有限元法

Key words

apple / drop impact / buffer packaging / finite element method

引用本文

导出引用
谢颖佳, 张藩, 孙建明, 潘笑, 常萍萍. 苹果缓冲包装结构设计及性能分析[J]. 包装工程(技术栏目). 2025, 46(13): 169-175 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2025.13.019
XIE Yingjia, ZHANG Fan, SUN Jianming, PAN Xiao, CHANG Pingping. Structural Design and Performance Analysis of Apple Buffer Packaging[J]. Packaging Engineering. 2025, 46(13): 169-175 https://doi.org/10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2025.13.019
中图分类号: TB482    TB485.3   

参考文献

[1] LIN H, FU F H, LI J H, et al.Investigation of Effects of Cushioning Packaging on the Physiological and Quality Changes in Chinese Olive Fruits during Cold Chain Transportation[J]. Foods, 2024, 13(24): 4133.
[2] 李昭, 曹萌萌, 孙建明, 等. 鸡蛋缓冲包装跌落冲击力学仿真及验证[J]. 食品与机械, 2019, 35(3): 115-119.
LI Z, CAO M M, SUN J M, et al.Mechanical Simulation and Validation of Drop Impact of Cushioning Packaging for Eggs[J]. Food & Machinery, 2019, 35(3): 115-119.
[3] 王彪, 卢富德, 高德. 苹果-EPS泡沫系统冲击响应分析[J]. 包装工程, 2023, 44(7): 122-127.
WANG B, LU F D, GAO D.Impact Response Analysis of Apple-EPS Foam System[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2023, 44(7): 122-127.
[4] ÖZTEKIN Y B, GÜNGÖR B. Determining Impact Bruising Thresholds of Peaches Using Electronic Fruit[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2020, 262: 109046.
[5] 张阔, 刘洪杰, 李建平, 等. 管道输送装置苹果下落过程分析与仿真[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2024, 29(4): 152-163.
ZHANG K, LIU H J, LI J P, et al.Analysis and Simulation of the Apple Falling Process in Pipeline Transportation System[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2024, 29(4): 152-163.
[6] LIN M H, CHEN J H, CHEN F, et al.Effects of Cushioning Materials and Temperature on Quality Damage of Ripe Peaches According to the Vibration Test[J]. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 2020, 25: 100518.
[7] 王彪. 苹果在EPS/EPE/PE网套作用下的力学响应分析研究[D]. 株洲: 湖南工业大学, 2023.
WANG B.The Mechanical Response Analysis of Apple under the Action of EPS/EPE/PE Net Cover[D]. Zhuzhou: Hunan University of Technology, 2023.
[8] 王仕栋. 水果减振包装设计及其贮运性能研究[D]. 洛阳: 河南科技大学, 2022.
WANG S D.Design of Fruit Vibration Reduction Packaging and Its Storage and Transportation Performance[D]. Luoyang: Henan University of Science and Technology, 2022.
[9] WEI W Q, ZHANG N, LI B Q, et al.Simulated Logistical Transport Effects on Textural Change of Wax Apple Using Different Packaging Types during Storage Time[J]. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 2024, 43: 101285.
[10] 陶连豪, 高金国, 吴雨萌, 等. EPE网套包装皇冠梨的静力学特性及损伤研究[J]. 包装工程, 2024, 45(9): 1-9.
TAO L H, GAO J G, WU Y M, et al.Static Characteristics and Damage of Huangguan Pears Packaged with EPE Net[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2024, 45(9): 1-9.
[11] 邓津仡. 番茄振动特性及其贮运损伤控制研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2024.
DENG J Y.Study on Vibration Characteristics of Tomato and Its Storage and transportation Damage Control[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2024.
[12] 陈思宇. 苹果力学损伤特性研究及采收试验平台设计[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2022.
CHEN S Y.Study on Mechanical Damage Characteristics of Apple and Design of Harvesting Test Platform[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2022.
[13] 朱健军. 富士苹果压缩损伤特性与品质劣变机理[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2022.
ZHU J J.Compression Damage and Quality Deterioration Mechanism of 'Fuji' Apple Fruit[D]. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2022.
[14] 张凯. 苹果在碰撞过程中界面运动状态演化规律及其组织损伤特性的研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2024.
ZHANG K.Research on the Evolution Laws of Interface Motion States and Tissue Damage Characteristics of Apples During Collision[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2024.
[15] 孙祺傑. 苹果收获输送过程损伤原理及试验研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2023.
SUN Q J.Damage Principle and Experimental Research of Apple Harvesting and Conveying Process[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2023.
[16] ZHOU L H, KANG N B, QU Q J, et al.Advances in Multi-Scale Biomechanics of Fruits and Vegetables: A Review[J]. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 2024, 47(12): e14778.
[17] 杜社妮, 李晶晶, 张蕊, 等. 苹果果实硬度适宜测定部位的研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2011(24): 33-35.
DU S N, LI J J, ZHANG R, et al.Study on Suitable Parts for Apple Firmness Determination[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2011(24): 33-35.
[18] 丁玉平. 基于ANSYS/LS-DYNA的某缓冲包装缓冲特性分析与优化[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2014.
DING Y P.Cushioning Characteristics Analysis and Optimization of Some Cushioning Package Based on ANSYS/LS-DYNA[D]. Wuxi: Jiangnan University, 2014.
[19] 张业鹏. 纸浆模塑包装结构的缓冲性能及其可靠性研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2007.
ZHANG Y P.Research on cushion performance and reliability about paper-pulp packaging structure[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2007.
[20] 常江, 巩雪, 李丹婷, 等. 鸡蛋缓冲包装设计及力学性能分析[J]. 包装工程, 2018, 39(3): 55-58.
CHANG J, GONG X, LI D T, et al.Design and Mechanical Properties of the Cushioning Packaging of Egg[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2018, 39(3): 55-58.
[21] 卢立新, 李春飞. 单层与多层苹果跌落冲击损伤研究[J]. 包装工程, 2006, 27(6): 1-3.
LU L X, LI C F.Research on Dropping Bruising of Single Layer and Multilayer Apples[J]. Packaging Engineering, 2006, 27(6): 1-3.
[22] 李寒东. 苹果包装件有限元分析及优化设计[J]. 印刷技术, 2016(20): 52-55.
LI H D.Finite Element Analysis and Optimal Design of Apple Packaging[J]. Printing Technology, 2016(20): 52-55.

基金

河南省科技厅重点研发与推广专项(科技攻关)项目(242102241055)

PDF(4839 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/